Adam Chehouri WRITE

A year ago, I received an invitation from my university to participate in the known competition of '' Présenter Ma Thèse en 180 Secondes ''. Like the many emails I receive, I did not give it any value, and to be honest I was busy preparing for my doctoral exams. Also, I had just terminated my first year and all I had really conducted was a very long bibliographic review. I was just beginning to understand my thesis and a year later, I can honestly say that many of the initial objectives have been modified and my research has a new set of targets.  Long story short, this year I received the same invitation, and for some reason I starred the email and took note to maybe give it more consideration this time. I replied to the organizer at my university and asked him to send me more information regarding the competition.

I am really excited in sharing with you this Webinar by Elsevier Publishing Campus  on how a researcher should deal with the reviewer's comments . I really encourage young researchers to sign up  to Elsevier Publishing Campus for free lectures and very interactive training. Whether it be your interested in writing a journal article, wondering how the peer review process is conducted or even understanding publishing ethics, whatever it may be, EPC has many resources to help researchers achieve some of their goals.  Often enough, authors are asked to revise their paper with minor or major revisions and in many other likely cases the paper is rejected. Regardless of the type of response, the authors receive a series of comments that have been forwarded from the reviewers to the editor .

''  Interdisciplinarity has become all the rage as scientists tackle climate change and other intractable issue. But there is still strong resistance to crossing borders ... We have to bring people with different kinds of skills and expertise together. No one has everything that's needed. '' This is a repost of Heidi Ledford article in the Nature News  posted in September 2015. You can read the pdf or the html version.

I am proud to be at the top of the list : Top Grand Research Internship profiles on LinkedIn.

Check out the most popular stories that have been read in the last 12 months in Elsevier. Click Here to read full article. 1) 3 top tips for responding to reviewer comments on your manuscript 2) Learn all you need to know about the publishing process with our free downloadable guides 3) Free access to journals for unemployed postdocs

If your a researcher submitting your paper to a journal published through Elsevier, your familiar with their current submission system called EES (Elsevier Editorial System). The interface is very basic for an author point of view, but it is even more rigorous for the editors to work with. It is obvious it requires an updated version, particularly since competing journals have been using for years a more advanced editorial system. I'd like to share with you a detailed article about the new editorial system called EVISE, that is expected to be used by all Elsevier journals by October 2016.  Click here to read the full article. Please read, discuss and share ! 

'' When you are doing research you are primarily focused on your hypothesis, methods, test results and research outcome. You are an expert in your research field and are very aware of what others are researching and publishing too. But the actual art of gettign your own paper ready for publication requires quite some expertise and a great deal of serious attention and preparation.'' ( Source ) I really recommend you watch this online lecture that includes  valuable points that should be taken when you choose a journal for submission.  Q & A session: with Elsevier's Executive Publisher Jaap van Harten Moderator: Gwendolyn Holstege , Researcher Relation Manager at Elsevier  Click here to view the video.